Living Guide to Social Innovation Labs
ENG
ENG
  • Introduction
  • Seeing
    • Understanding Complex Problems
      • Challenge Statements
      • Systems Thinking
      • Systems Mapping
      • Leverage Points
      • Wicked Questions
    • Design Research
      • Design Thinking
      • Ethnography
      • Interviews
      • Journey Mapping
      • Service Blueprint
      • Sensemaking
      • Dashboards
    • Systemic Design
    • Identifying and Engaging Key People
      • Stakeholders
      • Stakeholder Mapping
  • Doing
    • Co-Creation
      • Convening
        • Is Convening the Right Tool?
        • Types of Convening
      • Facilitation
      • Collective Impact
      • Ideation
    • Prototyping
      • Prototyping in a Lab Context
      • Testing
      • Types and Modalities
      • Prototyping Approaches
    • Scaling
      • Growth Thresholds
      • Scaling Up, Out, Deep
      • Tactics for Scaling
      • Scaling Strategy
    • Monitoring, Measuring and Communicating Impact
      • Types of Evaluation
      • Logic Models
      • Measures and Metrics
      • Standards of Evidence
      • Evaluating Complexity
      • Communicating Impact
  • Being
    • Innovation Labs and Process
      • Agile Project Management
      • Value Proposition
      • Theory for Change
      • Business Models
    • Resourcing and Team
      • Lab Partners
      • Team Expertise and Skills
      • Wellbeing of Remote Teams
      • Funding
    • Inclusion and Equity Practice
      • Power Structures
      • Innovation for Real Transformation
      • Truth and Reconciliation
      • Recommendations for Inclusive Practice
  • Share my content
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Defining Sensemaking
  • Examples and Resources

Was this helpful?

  1. Seeing
  2. Design Research

Sensemaking

Sensemaking is the process of making meaning by a group of people based on their collective experiences.

PreviousService BlueprintNextDashboards

Last updated 5 years ago

Was this helpful?

Defining Sensemaking

The following information has been contributed from Ben Weinlick and Aleeya Velji as Think Jar Collective in the Social Innovation Field Guide found here:

Sense-making really just means coming together and making meaning from your experiences to figure out what is happening and why. At this stage you have talked to a bunch of people in the community, and you’ve documented your interviews.

First, on your own you’ll think about the interviews you have had and key things you have learned. Then with the rest of your lab team you’ll get together, share learning, develop insights together, find themes and begin to uncover leverage points for designing around.

For more information on leverage points, click on the link below:

Examples and Resources

In the links below you can find some tools to help you think through your learnings from interviews and articles. The tools can help you record some of the important things to take back to your lab and share with them.

Before you get into group sense making of interviews and articles, it can be helpful to have some categories to sort insights. You’re going to have a lot of stories and a lot of insights. The categories below can help to make sense of them. These are just examples of potential categories, and can be adapted based on the context of your challenge.

Needs

Challenges

Dig Deeper

Ideas that could help

Unexpected insights

Instructions: Bucketing Field Work Insights

1) Set up Gather your team(s) of 7-9 people max and ensure each person has filled out the worksheets in the links from the previous tab with core insights from interviews and articles. Post the headings listed in the table above on a large board or butcher block paper.

2) Brainstorm Give everyone sticky notes and sharpies and a time constraint (possibly 6 mins per story share). One at a time each person shares one of their interview stories and insights from the interview. As one person shares the interview story, the other participants write down any insights that fall into the category buckets. 3) Categorize At the end of each story sharing round, participants share their sticky note insights and decide which bucket they think they should put the insight into.

4) Repeat You might do 5-6 rounds of this

After you do a sense making round, lab teams will find they have more questions, more assumptions and more uncertainty. This is good. Embrace it and identify what you need to do next to optimize your time in order to dig deeper.

Depending on how much time you have for your lab field work to dig deeper, you’ll want to identify if the lab team should go back to the same people they interviewed for another round to explore deeper, or if new areas opened up to explore further insights. Or both.

Often this is a stage where lab explorers recognize they might not have explored the challenge area theme of the lab with interviewees and missed key things.

In the next rounds lab explorers will go deeper and insights will come back richer

You can follow similar processes to bucketing insights together as a lab team after each round of field work.

Leverage Points
Worksheets to summarize your interviews
Worksheets to summarize your insights from articles and media
Social Innovation Lab Field GuideThink Jar Collective
Logo
Categorizing field work insights. Source: Social Innovation Field Guide, Ben Weinlick and Aleeya Velji